1-888-365-2779
+1-888-365-2779
Try Now
More in this section

Forums / Bugs & Issues / Performance frontend / backend

Performance frontend / backend

22 posts, 0 answered
  1. Daniel Plomp
    Daniel Plomp avatar
    112 posts
    Registered:
    14 Jun 2012
    01 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hi,

    I've downloaded the latest SF 4.1 SP2. I noticed that the frontend speed isn't quite okay. The website isn't much responsive, as I'm used to with SF 3.7.

    Also, in the backend, the popups are taking a long time to load.

    Just to let you know that it isn't hardware: I'm running my dev environment on a Macbook Pro with max. memory and a SSD disk.

    SF 3.7 is fast as lightning!

    Anyone else who has problems with this?

    Regards,
    Daniel
  2. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    01 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Dear Daniel

    Well first of all SF needs a lot of RAM to run smoothly. 500 MB is what the specs say at the moment.

    Telerik aims to make SF faster which each release.

    I have one ticket open because on one site my front-end is about 30-50% slower with the latest 4.1 SP2 release compared to the 4.1 SP1 release. Unfortunately I have no feedback as to this is just the case with my site or if this is a real issue with the 4.1 SP2 release.

    Markus
  3. Daniel Plomp
    Daniel Plomp avatar
    112 posts
    Registered:
    14 Jun 2012
    04 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hi Markus,

    Well, I do consider rewriting my site back to 3.7, since the speed just isn't acceptable. Great that it will be faster with every release, but I suppose it will be with version 4.3 or something that the speed is like 3.7 again.

    I also had the idea that SP1 and before were faster?
    Strange...

    Regards,
    Daniel
  4. Hristo Borisov
    Hristo Borisov avatar
    190 posts
    Registered:
    19 Jun 2017
    05 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hello Daniel Plomp and Markus,

    There is a slight difference in the performance of the two service packs. We are currently setting up a robust performance testing environment that will allow us to demonstrate the performance of the system with each new release. We have already scheduled a lot of resources to speed up the performance and you might expect significant improvements with the Q2 release due in a month.

    Until then please excuse us for the inconvenience, we will do our best to resolve all of your issues in a timely and consistent manner.

    Best wishes,
    Hristo Borisov
    the Telerik team
    Do you want to have your say in the Sitefinity development roadmap? Do you want to know when a feature you requested is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items
  5. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    05 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Dear Hristo

    Thanks for your feedback.

    Am I the only one that thinks that:

    QUOTE
    There is a slight difference in the performance of the two service packs
    UNQUOTE

    Got to be a huge understatement?

    If you look at this two demo pages

    http://sitefinity.test-it-now.com (4.1 sp 2)
    http://staging.sitefinity.test-it-now.com (4.1 sp 1)

    Then on the initial page load you will notice that the SP2 takes about 30-50% longer then the SP1. Once chached they are equally fast. Backend SP2 might be super fast over SP1 but FrontEnd came at least in my testing to a much worse performance.

    Your goal:  Targeted 20% increase in the performance of Sitefinity backend and front end.

    4.1 SP1 = 100 %
    4.1 SP2  = 130 % (30% slower)
    4.2         = 104 % (if you take the 20% of SP2) So no gain at all. One step front - two steps back.

    I wish Telerik would have a policy that if they see a performance decrease in a morning build, they would fix it in the afternoon. And if they see one in a SP2 that seem (at least to me to be drastic) would have a hotfix for it!

    At the moment I simply can not apply SP2 because the initial page load take about 1 second longer for each page making it feel like a crawl (SF is not yet known to be the fastest CMS around). Support was not yet able to tell me if something was wrong with my test pages so I assume the slightly difference in performance is simply a problem of my server.

    Happy for anyone who feels like testing it themself.

    Put a SP1 and SP2 on the same server (preverably real hosting) and test it yourself. I hope to be proven wrong.

    Sorry
  6. Hristo Borisov
    Hristo Borisov avatar
    190 posts
    Registered:
    19 Jun 2017
    07 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hi Markus Berchtold,

    Georgi Chokov has answered your performance concerns in your support thread. Please let us know whether there is anything else we should consider for improvement for our Q2 release that is a showstopper for you.

    All the best,
    Hristo Borisov
    the Telerik team
    Do you want to have your say in the Sitefinity development roadmap? Do you want to know when a feature you requested is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items
  7. Nicolas
    Nicolas avatar
    156 posts
    Registered:
    19 Jan 2011
    07 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hi Hristo,

    for me we need Refine Multi-language support for Documents already references in PITS and a more mature version permission's management.

    Regards,
    Nicolas
  8. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    07 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Dear Hristo

    My first tests confirm that the next internal build will be much much much faster then the current SP2 1501 release on the front end side (did not really test back end)

    For the Q2 release

    a) make sure release it realy in the week of the 25th of July
    b) make sure we don't have some last minutes suprises like with SP2

    I would have hopped for an hotfix for SP2 but see that this is a lot of work. Looking forward to a faster, better 4.2.

    Good job

    Markus
  9. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    07 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Most improvements could be done in forms. I have a suggestion post with at least 10 that seem to make sense to more then me.

    It would be nice if Telerik would finaly fix old old bugs.

    For example if you layout a form and want to use pixel you are

    a) still bound to the width that SF thinks a form should be
    b) once you play around with the pixel width you end up strang.

    To me the forms module should realy have the beta tag behind it. To me forms are simply not really usable for end user clients.

    Integrate the mailing option from the marketplace.

    Markus
  10. Steve
    Steve avatar
    3037 posts
    Registered:
    03 Dec 2008
    08 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    I worry a a bit that since there is the forms Mailing control in the marketplace the priority of that feature (which everyone wants) has nose-dived to the bottom of the pile

    ...just  a guess though.
  11. Hristo Borisov
    Hristo Borisov avatar
    190 posts
    Registered:
    19 Jun 2017
    12 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hi Steve,

    We have a pits item for this with a very high priority and we will do our best to include it with one of our next major releases. Please excuse us for the inconvenience, we are doing our best to serve all customer request based on their priorities.


    All the best,
    Hristo Borisov
    the Telerik team
    Do you want to have your say in the Sitefinity development roadmap? Do you want to know when a feature you requested is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items
  12. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    12 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Dear Hristov

    How about all the other request  and bugs for forms?

    Bug - use layout in forms with pixel is still a bad idea

    Sugestions - http://www.sitefinity.com/devnet/forums/sitefinity-4-x/suggestions/forms-improvements.aspx

    Like Steve I am longing for the function to have mail send when a form is submited (seems to be doable from what I see from marketplace) but working/layouting forms is still not in any way really possible for endusers.

    Markus
  13. Hristo Borisov
    Hristo Borisov avatar
    190 posts
    Registered:
    19 Jun 2017
    14 Jul 2011
    Link to this post
    Hello Markus Berchtold,

    We are considering all feature requests and in this specific case Antoaneta has included them as UX tasks that should be resolved. However, we are currently streaming a lot of resources to improve some key performance bottlenecks in order to make Sitefinity even faster, and I cannot bind to a specific date on which your suggestions will be included.

    Thank you for contacting us.

    Kind regards,
    Hristo Borisov
    the Telerik team
    Do you want to have your say in the Sitefinity development roadmap? Do you want to know when a feature you requested is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items
  14. Andrei
    Andrei avatar
    553 posts
    Registered:
    27 Nov 2008
    31 Jan 2012
    Link to this post
    Hristo,
    Do you have any projections about the speed (performance) increases coming with Sitefinity 5.0 in relation to 4.3 or 4.4? Some percentages would be fine. I would be keen to know if we should plan an upgrade for our customer as they are complaining about the speed a bit.

    Many thanks,
    Andrei
  15. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    Dear Andrei

    I see you post about speed from time to time and really do not have to much trouble with it. Yes SF is not fast as lightning and there  is lot of improvements that can be made.
    However I would be interested to see a screencast of your sites acutall performance.
    I noticed that also in the backend the first time you open it takes long as well as it takes really some time to load the first generic content edit module.

    But after an initial load SF to me is quite ok. I was just wondering what it looks like on your side.

    PS: Here is a screencast from a site running in the US on Arvixe VPS. I am accassing it from Switzerland and am using Chrome which of course is a HUGE difference to IE8 for example

    http://www.marktold.com/screencast/sf_speed.swf

    I would consider the speed as fast and in no way bothering me. But then again I am working with small business sites with not much traffic.

    Markus
  16. Andrei
    Andrei avatar
    553 posts
    Registered:
    27 Nov 2008
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    Markus,

    Thanks for taking the time to ansnwer. Was that version 4.4 or 4.3? In your opinion, is 4.4 faster than 4.3?

    Ok, here is a small extract from an email I have received 2 days ago from our customer...

    1. At the co-ords position the delay in publishing is now very evident, ranging from 7 – 20 seconds. Sometimes you get an Error “ The workflow has been aborted” .

      They are running version 4.3. The system is an intranet running in somewhat of a mission critical environment. There are 28 terminals only, but only about half of them are really used on daily basis. There are 2 IIS7+ Web Servers Load Balanced that are serving the terminals. To me that is quite adequate. The issue is most visible on this one page that has about 15 Content Blocks on it and is amended about 4 times a day. There are also two SQL Server 2008 R2 Mirrored across two separate boxes. All on the same local LAN.

    Personally, I thought that version 4.3 was much better than all the previous ones, but my problem is that I am still receiving emails like the above and there isn't much that I can think of apart from upgrading them and hope that will speed things up. Now yes, the page is quite loaded, so it is understandable that it will take a bit longer, however, I would love to see it go down a bit more.

    If my customer is happy then I am happy, but for now, my customer would like to see it a little bit faster, hence I keep fishing for information. All the other customers are happy with the speed, but this particular one isn't, so that's why I keep asking the same question over and over again.

    Personally, I love Sitefinity and can't wait until the next project, but it hurts receiving emails like that from the customers who paid really good money for the system (Professional Edition and all).

    I hope I don't come across as a nagging person. The Documentation portal has been launched now, I will check out all the articles on Optimization and see if there are a few things that I can do already. I hope the Optimization section of it is comprehensive.

    Thanks again Markus,
    Andrei
  17. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    Dear Andrei
    The screencast was a 4.4 version.
    But again switching from IE8 to Chrome for example is a way more noticable speed improvement then 4.3 to 4.4. Anyhow if something to 2 seconds and now is 10% faster its 1.8 seconds. I really dont feel these 0.2 seconds especially when you have customers uploading 100kb images displaying them at 200 x 100 pixel.

    From your description
    1) only one customer having a problem
    2) not much users 10-20
    3) Internal site

    I would bet my tomorrows lunch that the problem is not SF but something else.

    I assume you have used tools like fiddler2.com yslow and stuff to see what is really going on.

    - What browser are they using
    - Do they have 3MB picuters they display small
    - how about the connection from the IIS to the SQL Server is there a problem
    - Security issues

    Do you have access to the servers? If yes I would open a ticket (maybe again) asking Telerik to think out of the box to help you find the bottle neck.

    Again - to me that sure is not a regular SF problem but something with the setup.

    Markus
  18. Andrei
    Andrei avatar
    553 posts
    Registered:
    27 Nov 2008
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    Thanks Markus,

    By the way I have some very good friends in Switzerland. Hoping to visit that fine country of your at some point.

    They are using IE9. We are a Microsoft Certified Partner and everything we deliver is Microsoft. I forgot to say that the other customers are not using the system as intensively as this one and they are using 3.7. No there are no images. The network is all good, there are no issues. It is a solid, brand new network. The network is isolated from internet. I have supervised access to the network only, and all the things I try require a wheelbarrow of paperwork. Not fun to keep updating it.

    I think I will wait for 5.0, download it, and do my own performance tests on that given page. I think it is just that page with 15 Custom Content Blocks that is a bit slow when loading and publishing. Cant wait for the decoupling to happen as I think that will really make a big difference. Personally I don't mind having a hundred DLLs as long as they are on disk and not in memory.

    Thanks again,
    Andrei
  19. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    Dear Andrei
    When you are talking about Custom Content Blocks what are you talking about exactely.
    Simply 15 content blocks with or are you talking about some custom controls?
    Markus
  20. Andrei
    Andrei avatar
    553 posts
    Registered:
    27 Nov 2008
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    I am talking about a custom control. I would send you a ZIP file of it, but the forum does not allow. I have had it checked by Telerik as well though.
    Andrei
  21. Markus
    Markus avatar
    2763 posts
    Registered:
    25 Nov 2005
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    @Andrei

    If you hade a page with just 15 simple content blocks on it would the backend also be slow? If now then it would be the custom controls.

    Testing by eliminating is often a good practice. Kind of try and error but works a lot of the times :-)
    Markus
  22. Andrei
    Andrei avatar
    553 posts
    Registered:
    27 Nov 2008
    01 Feb 2012
    Link to this post
    Yes Markus, its the backend that is slow. Front end is fine, in the backend when you open it in edit mode and publish it. all the other pages that are not loaded as much seem to be a bit faster. so it points to to this page and the fact that it has more controls on it. it seems to really slow it down when it comes to editing and publishing, if the page is quite busy

    don't worry though, the only thing i wanted to know in the first place was whether advances in speed were still being made or not. thanks for your help.

    Andrei
22 posts, 0 answered