More in this section

Forums / General Discussions / SiteFinity 5.1 Community Edition returns an error on first ever use!

SiteFinity 5.1 Community Edition returns an error on first ever use!

2 posts, 0 answered
  1. Ed
    Ed avatar
    1 posts
    03 Jan 2008
    21 Nov 2012
    Link to this post
    For the first time today I started using SiteFinity 5.1.327 (Community Edition) on a 64-bit Windows 7 machine; so far I cannot even get the default web-site up and running.  In the Project Manager window I select "Create a New Project" and choose an IIS-based web-site on my local machine that connects to a remote SQL Server Database.  If I then attempt to administer the site, it crashes out after about 20 minutes with a time-out error, although the SiteFinity database appears on the remote server (just tables, no views or stored procedures).  If I then go to http://localhost/mysite/Sitefinity/Startup I see the following message:

    The system is restarting...
    Please wait a few seconds. You will be redirected automatically.

    and the browser (Firefox) gets stuck in an infinite loop.

    What am I doing wrong?  I installed it back in August with the default settings and everything looked OK.  Is it really this difficult to use?
  2. Victor Velev
    Victor Velev avatar
    1345 posts
    06 Jul 2015
    21 Nov 2012
    Link to this post
    Hello Ed,

    The problems that you are encountering may be coming from a number of different areas, but it is most likely that the remote SQL server might be causing the issues ( due to connection issues ) .

    In order to diagnose the issues, can you try to create a new project again on IIS ( and configure it according to our documentation :

    and choose SQLExpress or a local Server instance.

    Kind regards,
    Victor Velev
    the Telerik team
    Do you want to have your say in the Sitefinity development roadmap? Do you want to know when a feature you requested is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items
2 posts, 0 answered